Bat-DFHC 4/18/2011

Item 1 >>> Now Playing  I Was Kaiser Bill\’s Batman  A Milli Vanilli moment from 1967…the guy who was Whistling Jack Smith on TV and at live appearances wasn’t the same guy who whistled on the record, and neither was named Jack Smith. Nor did the song have anything to do with Batman, altho it reached #20 on the charts in early 1967. A batman was a European military officer’s assistant, and Kaiser Bill was Queen Victoria’s grandson who ruled Germany during WWI. Holy Bait & Switch! Still, a cool instrumental novelty from the anything-goes 60s.

item 2 >>> LQQK @ †h∆†!  Big Screen Batman ’66   Trailer to the movie version. Why did the ad say “In Color!” when the TV show obviously was, and glaringly so? So that people didn’t confuse it with the other Batman movie making the rounds…the 1943 black-and-white serial…dusted off to cash in on the bat-hype while the cashing in was good…

item 3 >>> Wednesday, January 12, 1966…The day Batman debuted on the tube, and the Super Hero fad took off like a shot. Actually, this had been brewing for some time, as comic book characters were key motifs in Pop Art, as well as the emerging “Camp” Movement and the college-born Trivia Craze. The advertising “birdman” (below, lower right) shows the “screened dots” so typical of that trend. And if it was hot, Bob Hope jumped on it, you betcha.


item 3 >>> Quick, the Tracing Paper!…
In my family, the creative siblings immediately went Biff!! Bang!! Pow!!, lead by me, being the oldest. That Sunday, I chose a panel from the strip The Phantom…the Ghost Who Walks has an ecological learning moment when the big butterfly gets munched, nez pah?…traced a template, and began creating my own Super Heroes…

item 4 >>>  …which seemed to center around animals…altho not entirely. Clockwise from top left: The Red Falcon, Lizzard Man [sic], Invisi-Man (can you see him?), and Kiwi Man.

item 5 >>>  And Naturally, Versions of Batman…Here, the leopard-skinned Jungle Batman (top right). I was almost 15 at the time. Below that, the “real” jungle Batman, looking more like the Bat Flintstones, altho at some point he stripped to the waist. (Left) is a page from my sister Suzanne’s Batman coloring book…she saved it all these years, and says mine was the inspiration for this spotted treatment. She was 9 going on 10…

item 6 >>> Rainbow Suzie…Well, she’s kin so I guess I’m prejudiced, but this looks pretty groovy for a 4th grader…

item 7 >>>  I had my own spectrum guy, Captain Rainbow…seen here with typical Batman kolor kookiness. (Top right) is the nutty adventure…but weren’t they all?…of the Rainbow Batman, which I don’t believe I was aware of at the time…

…despite the fact that it was originally published in March, 1957…OOF!

item 8  >>>  And  √√√√√√  out this effect…checkered shadow and everything…neato! 

item 9 >>>  Meanwhile…I had it in mind to “update” traditional heroes…these are Tarzan ’66 and Superman ’66…apparently he got tired of blue, switched to green…plus a real cowl and mask, in case somebody at long last recognized him without his Clark Kent glasses…sheesh…

item 10 >>> Even my younger brother Dave got in the act…Yup, more animals…and Super Heroes are as popular today, almost 50 years later…with Thor  and Captain America movies out this summer. Shazam!


Wicked Ballsy 

And wouldn’t you know it, the Midnight Skulker makes an appearance in Sunday’s B.C. comic strip. That animal with him is a new character, Wolfie…and he’s also now wearing a cowl, altho still with the telephone tree, as seen below in his very first appearance, March 25, 1966 (below).  I think the point is to send relief to the Land of the Rising Sun, tho I’m not 100% sure…

Holy Shameless Plugs!, Batman…

Podcasts at http://stolfpod.podbean.com  and   http://thewholething.podbean.com

Other Daily blog at http://stolf.wordpress.com  (the legendary Stolf’s Blog)

More bloggage at  http://travelingcyst.blogspot.com  and  http://www.examiner.com/retro-pop-culture-in-watertown/mark-john-astolfi

Resume at http://travelingcyst.blogspot.com/p/resume.html

Audio samples coming soon…or just check the podcasts…twc-rr so still über-blows turbo…


Posted in \baby boomers | Leave a comment

G4BB pt. 15: More Kinship in Action!

More Kinship in Action!

15.1  I want to sketch out another interesting Family Tree, but before I do that, a few words on relationships that don’t show up in the typical Tree diagram…which is to say, they are not based on other blood relations or marriage. Like “Foster” parents, children, siblings…when a person is raised by someone who is not their biological parent. I almost said “who is not related to them” but of course a Grandparent could be a Foster parent. And if there is no true kinship tie, does Foster extend to cousins, uncles grandparents? There are probably as many different ways of looking at it as their are families.

15.2  The Foster relationship can be codified by a legal Adoption…or the Guardian/Ward relationship…the big difference being that in general you can legally marry your Ward, but not your Adopted Child. In the Middle Ages, there was something called a “Charge.” This was a child who became the legal responsibility of a nobleman, an obvious honor for and benefit to the parents. Interestingly enough, the Charge was sometimes, while treated as the nobleman’s child, also considered a hostage, to ensure the loyalty of the parents. And you may have heard The Cow called the “Foster Mother of the human race”…recalling the Spanish for Foster Mother…Madre de Leche…Milk Mother.

15.3  There are also religious institutions, such as Godparents…sometimes actual relatives, other times not. And in some churches, marriage between Godparents and Godchildren is not allowed even if they are unrelated. Adding a social aspect to the purely religious one, I seem to recall a novel by Mario Puzo…

15.4  Then there are “honorary” or “titular” relations…from the word “title”…typically a close friend of the family who is known as a Cousin or Uncle. Not all families do this…in some, only real Uncles are called “Uncle.” But 2 good examples come from The Andy Griffith Show.  When Aunt Bee misplaces her Aunt Martha’s ring, she explains that Martha is just an old dear friend of her Mother’s, not an actual Aunt. This episode is also interesting in that Jack Dodson makes his 1st appearance on the show, not as county clerk Howard Sprague, but as the Taylor’s insurance man Ed Jenkins. I call this the “Barney Miller Effect,” since many of the actors who went on to become regular or semi-regular characters on that show made their first appearance in a completely different role…before he was Sgt. Dietrich for example, Steve Landesberg played a priest!

15.5  Similarly, there’s an episode where Cousin Gloria breaks up with her fiancee then visits the Taylors…and she’s not an actual relative either. Of course Aunt Bee herself is an instructive case, for a number of reasons, not the least of which being she isn’t really Andy’s Aunt…not his Father’s Brother…but Andy’s 1C1R, his Father’s 1st Cousin (but that’s a tale for another day!) But she is what you might call a “Practical Aunt”…an Aunt in practice. This typically happens when a Nephew is old enough to be included in the Parents’ generation, and is thus called an Uncle by his much younger Cousins. Or an Uncle is young enough to be considered a Cousin. In fact, I’m hearing more frequently from Baby Boomers who are investigating their family history, and have discovered so-and-so isn’t really the relation they always thought they were!

15.6  But in the case of Mayberry, both Opie and Andy call her “Aunt Bee,” and indeed she calls both of them…Father and Son…her Nephews. In this sense she is sort of a “Family Aunt” and we had one of those in my family. After my Maternal Grandmother’s Mother died in childbirth, she was cared for by an Aunt, Antonina Gesek, who became know to the family as Ciotka Gesek (pronounced “chutka”…the Polish word for Aunt.) Another of the Sisters of my Grandmother’s late Mother was Ciotka Nellie, but when someone just said “Ciotka,” it meant Gesek, no matter how they were related to her. Not for nothing, there was also an Uncle Voi…pronounced “voo-ee,” an Americanization of the Polish word for Uncle…Wuj…yes, Uncle Uncle!

15.7  But getting back to Aunt Bee, since everyone in town called her that, she was sort of a “Community Aunt,”besides being a “Family Aunt.” These are all nuances to keep in mind when researching your Family…you can’t necessarily take everything you find at face value, with respect to who’s what to whom. But lets get to the case of Louba…

15.8  And that would be Anna Louba Rubens née Klionsky, an accomplished English lady of Russian origins who died in 2004 at the age of 105. In her mid-90s (yes!!) she began a modeling career, and appeared on the cover of the British version of Vogue magazine at age 100. And she is also the linchpin that connects one Matthew Klionsky in 2 separate ways to the late playwright Arthur Miller. “MK” as we’ll call him wrote about it here  ,  after Miller’s death February 10, 2005.

15.9  As you can see in Chart 45, Zalman Mordecai Klionsky had 3 sons, of whom Shiman was MK’s Great Grandfather. Shiman was Louba’s Uncle, making MK’s Grandfather Louba’s 1st Cousin, and MK and Louba 1st Cousins Twice removed. In this chart the squares left blank are individuals MK doesn’t specifically mention, but which can be inferred. Thus MK is 3rd Cousin to Louba’s Grandson Paul Goodman, as well as Barnet Klionsky Jr.’s Granddaughter Cathy Klion. So where’s Mr. Marilyn Monroe? He’s coming, hang on…

15.10  In Chart 46,  as in Chart 45, the blood relatives of MK are enclosed in green boxes, to distinguish them from relatives by marriage, without whom…as the old saying goes…we ain’t got no story. Louba’s husband Joseph Rubens was a 1st Cousin of Michael Balcon, whose Grandson actor Daniel Day-Lewis married Arthur Miller’s Daughter Rebecca. Not the closest of relations I’ll grant you, but this is MK’s story, not mine. And it gets better, because…

15.11  MK’s 3rd Cousin Cathy Klion married Tom Potz, who’s Grandfather Isaac was the doctor who delivered Arthur Miller. As you can see in Chart 47, I improvised the symbolism somewhat, and very glad to do it. Now MK describes his 2 relationships to Arthur Miller in 2 different ways…and I believe if you check them against Chart 47, he’s, right on the nose, as far as that goes. But I must tell you, working on this Family Tree, I was as happy as a clam at high tide…haven’t had this much fun…since last week’s G4BB

“So, Arthur Miller was delivered by the grandfather of one third cousin’s husband, and his daughter married another third cousin’s third cousin. This can also be re-stated as follows: Louba had a first cousin whose granddaughter married a man whose grandfather was the doctor who delivered Arthur Miller. And, Louba’s cousin-by marriage (through her husband) had a grandson who married Arthur Miller’s daughter.”

15.12  Notice that when MK writes “married another third cousin’s third cousin”…the first he’s referring to is Paul Goodman, who is his 3rd Cousin on the Klionsky side. (“Another” means besides Cathy Klion, also MK’s 3rd Cousin.) The second is Daniel Day-Lewis, who is Paul Goodman’s 3rd Cousin on the Rubens side (Louba’s husband)…but MK and Day-Lewis are not 3rd Cousins, nor to his credit does MK suggest they are. Now I’m ready to poke around in the mailbag…

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

15.13  Dear Stolf: How is my Great Grandfather’s Niece related to my Niece?…from Ace in Ho-Ho-Kus, NJ…

15.14   How about a nice game of Who’s Zoomin Who? I’m up for it, and I’ll do this completely in my head (no charts), to demonstrate the typical steps you might take…and I say “typical” because there’s no right or wrong way to figure it, only a right or wrong answer at the end.

15.15   {Step 1}  Your Great Grandfather’s Niece is the Daughter of your Great Grandfather’s Brother…and as such is your Grandfather’s 1st Cousin. And we’re practically done already!

15.16  Because your Grandfather’s 1C is…{Step 2} your Father’s 1C 1R…{Step 3} and your 1C 2R…{Step 4} and your Niece’s 1C 3R. That last step deserves some elaboration, because it demonstrates the very important principle of interchangeability. As far as the folks going up your direct line are concerned, your Daughter and your Niece are interchangeably, and what’s true of one is true of the other…both are Grandchildren to your Father, Great Grandchildren to your Grandfather, and 2G Grandchildren to your Great Grandfather. Thus, the relationship of 3 Times Removed that would apply between your Daughter and your 1C 2R extends interchangeably to your Niece as well. And it goes without saying that that’s because to those direct ancestors, you and your Brother (your Niece’s Father) are also interchangeable.

15.17 As an exercise, you might try it again, but substitute “my Great Grand Niece” for “my Niece”… and good luck, my friend.

15.18  Dear Stolf:  I am teaching my high school English Class about euphemisms…how and why they evolve over time, like the progression: Colored, Negro, Black, African-American, People of Color. I gave them this assignment: Imagine a future where people are routinely cloned, but the word “clone” itself is considered offensive. Come up with possible words or phrases they might use for (1) the clone itself…(2) the person he was cloned from…and (3) what clones of the same person would call each other. What do think?…from Sparky in Anchorage…

15.19  You guys come up with some interesting questions, boy, and I think I couldn’t do better if I were making them up myself.  I considered many possibilities, some rather fanciful like sage and mage…gen, progen and cogen…dire (sire + dam), but here’s my final submission, and I expect at least an A- on this: The “donor” is the sire…the clone is the scion…and to each other the clones are horts (from cohorts.)  And since this is in the future, they’ll pronounce the second one SKY-on, not the currently correct SY-on. Next week, in honor of that Royal Wedding that’s generating so much commemorative merchandise, I’ll take Kinship in Action to the next level..Royal Action!plus letters, too, OK?

15.19.1  BTW…you’ll notice I used the word “cohort” in the sense of a single companion…one individual…bucking the current trend of using it in it’s original meaning, that of a group…I’ll be 60 years old in June, and I’ll do what I want, gabeesh?

wicked ballsy 

Last week in 14.8, I mentioned that an ancient Hindu riddle used the idea behind “I’m My Own Grandpa”…that of a man’s Wife’s Daughter from a previous marriage marrying his Father. As in the song, the riddle supposed each of these 2 unions resulted in a Son, and asks how these 2 boys would be related to each other. No, I didn’t neglect to give you the answer…just thought I’d let it rattle around in your coconut for a week, and see if anything happened.

Did it? Well, the traditional answer is that the 2 lads are both each other’s Uncles, and each other’s Nephews. That’s an an acceptable answer, altho if you make it HALF, you’re dead on. In Chart 48, I’ve marked up Chart 42b from last week with the patented Stolfistrator…and the Sons in questions are the obligatory Abner and Zeke. For the sake of simplicity, I’ll assume that I am the song’s narrator, indicated by ME.

I’ve marked the red circle that is my Wife’s Daughter with a green star, call her Star. As you can see, Star is Abner’s Half Sibling, since they have the same Mother but different Fathers. The Son of Abner’s Sibling would be his Nephew…Half Sibling, Half Nephew…so this way, Abner is the Half Uncle, Zeke the Half Nephew.

But with the Stolfistrator I’ve re-drawn Zeke and his Mother Star up closer to his Father, who is also my Father. Now you can see that Zeke and I are also Half Brothers…same Father, different Mothers. To Zeke, my Son Abner is the Son of his Half Brother…this way, Zeke is the Half Uncle and Abner is the Half Nephew. Done and done.

Copyright © 2011 Mark John Astolfi, All Rights Reserved


 

shameless shames & plugless plugs…

Podcasts at http://stolfpod.podbean.com  and   http://thewholething.podbean.com

Other Daily blog at http://stolf.wordpress.com  (Stolf’s Blog)

More bloggage at  http://travelingcyst.blogspot.com  and  http://www.examiner.com/retro-pop-culture-in-watertown/mark-john-astolfi

Resume at http://travelingcyst.blogspot.com

Audio samples coming soon…or just check the podcasts…


Posted in \baby boomers | Leave a comment

DFHC 4/16/2011

item 1 >>> Now Playing  She Likes Weeds    Guess what? The Dutch group the Tee Set recorded a lot more than just “Ma Belle Amie”…this is about a witchy woman…

item 2 >>> LQQK @ †h∆†!  Try a Little Tenderness   This is actually kind of spooky…it was done on  the Cleveland TV show Upbeat the day before Otis Redding and most of his band died in a plane crash in 1967. Guess it wouldn’t be appropriate to make fun of the horn section’s hairdos, huh? But what a performance, whew! Also interesting is the often-heard contention that he didn’t want to record this song…he loved Sam Cooke’s live LP version, and didn’t want to try to top it…so he recorded it in what he considered a jokey style, that nobody would ever seriously release. End result: big hit…and here he is, doing that self same version on TV. Maybe the story is bunk…or maybe he came to see that he’d delivered a pretty powerful treatment in spite of himself…

item 3 >>> Double or NothingThat image Thursday of the 1959 Oldsmobile’s split-apart headlights reminded me of a story from May’s Hemmings Classic Cars magazine, which just goes to show there are some strange things in this world, that don’t happen very often, but do happen. Like an auto dealership selling the same car to the same person twice. This wasn’t a case of multiple buyer’s remorse over a period of weeks or months, but actually 2 complete full-price purchases. It seems a rancher in Colorado, as a last-ditch effort to save his marriage, bought a brand new 1959 Oldsmobile 98 Holiday SportSedan for his wife. Didn’t work…she left with the kids and the car. Soon after, she traded it in for a different model, because it reminded her of him. On a whim, the salesman called the rancher and wondered if he might want it back…and because it reminded him of her (sob! sniff!) he bought it a second time, and stored it in a barn, much to the annoyance of his eventual 2nd wife. Ya can’t make this stuff up, dear friends…

BTW, this here is a SceniCoupe, not a SportSedan, which had a rear overhang roof…I just think this one is cooler, plus I like the paint scheme…sue me…

item 4 >>>…And Doubled Down…Do you remember when the “quad” headlights craze hit in 1958, you could update your 1957 like this. But you gotta wonder at the price in today’s dollars…a little steep just to be up-to-date, but such was the annual styling turnover…kind of like when you were in high school, a Junior dating a Sophomore…one measly year made a ton of difference. And I like where they say that this unit “slips” in…and they put slips in quotation marks…uh-oh. Reminds me of the Handyman’s Rule: Measure Twice, Cut Once, Beat into Place…

item 5 >>> Sudsy Bubbles Bursting in the BreezeIn the news, ABC has cancelled 2 of its soap operas, One Life to Live and All My Children. Once they’re gone, that will leave just 4….4!…remaining daytime sudsers, as they’re called in the trade. I read back in 1999, in an article from the L.A. Times, that between 1969 and 1970, there was a period when 19 soaps were running simultaneously on the networks’ daytime schedule, a record. I was able to confirm that number, even narrowed down the dates, and was going to make a chart but the net beat me to it…

item 6 >>> When Did They Do Housework?…As you can see, CBS had a marathon from 11:30 in the morning till 4 in the afternoon, with just a half-hour time-out….and many stations filled that slot with syndicated re-runs of Peyton Place, which had ended its 5-year run in prime-time the year before. As to the specific time period, on March 30, 1970, 3 new soaps debuted…on NBC, Somerset, a spinoff of Another World…and on ABC, trying hard to play catch-up, A World Apart and The Best of Everything. Only 2 of these new shows made it to year’s end, as TBOE last aired on September 25th. But for those 6 months, there were indeed 19 network daytime soap operas to choose from. Well, 21 if you count the PP repeats…popular enough to spawn the first-run soap Return to Peyton Place in 1972…and the syndicated Strange Paradise, a Dark Shadows knockoff…

item 7 >>> Now Wait a Minute…or a Quarter of an Hour…what about the 1950s? After all, until debut of the half-hour Edge of Night and As the World Turns, both on April 2, 1956, TV soap operas were just 15 minutes long, as they were on the radio. Couldn’t there have been more than 19 at one time? Well, I skimmed a couple a daytime schedules and counted up to 15 at once, so it’s conceivable…I will research it fully and let you know. The thing working against that possibility is that only CBS and NBC were in the game…ABC’s first soap, the 30-minute Road to Reality, didn’t debut until 1960…and when they put on General Hospital in 1963, it was only their 2nd soap ever. And in case you’re wondering, the last traditional hold-outs were Search For Tomorrow and The Guiding Light, both expanding to half an hour in September of 1968.

 item 8 >>> Big D, My Oh Yes…I was a big General Hospital fan during the classic “Luke & Laura” era…I remember Demi Moore, John Stamos, Jack Wagner, and of course MacGuyver when they were on. Amazing how addictive they could be…I recall my Italian grandfather, after he retired, cooking up a big plate of spaghett’ and happily planting himself down to watch his “stories”…yes, grandfather. I was a GHer well into the 1980s, until, shall we say, “real life caught up with me,” leave it at that. Actually, I had gotten hooked several years before, back when I was going to a broadcasting school in Boston after college. I would race home on my bike, stop off at Taco Bell to grab a bag of mini’s (which I don’t believe they make anymore) and get home in time for The Secret Storm. In fact, I’d only been watching for about 6 months when it was cancelled, altho it was cool the last week, as they neatly wrapped up all the plot-lines. And I also got a kick out of Dallas…who didn’t? But did you know, it started out as a mini-series? True dat…5 consecutive Sundays in April, 1978…then “Season 2” began in earnest  that Fall…

item 9 >>> And Speaking of Actual Soap…this campaign has always been one of my favorites, from 1970…(This guy has favorite advertisements? You betcha…say, how long have you been reading DFHC, anyhow?) Not for nothing, but why does Sheila remind me of those creepy elf cookie-jars? And I’m betting that finger she’s holding up isn’t really her finger…sure, they were pulling that kind of crap waaaaay before the invention of Photoshop, absolutely…

item 10 >>> And rounding out today’s posting, heh heh…go to bed with a hunk, why dontcha?

Wicked Ballsy 

Or how about this one from Germany, 1973…those glasses…that mouth….¡ay yi yi!…I wonder if German mothers threatened their babes with Johanna if they put up a fuss at bedtime…nooooooooooooo!


shameless cold-water plugs für die Waschmaschine, gegen Schmutz…

Podcasts at http://stolfpod.podbean.com  and   http://thewholething.podbean.com

Other Daily blog at http://stolf.wordpress.com  (the legendary Stolf’s Blog)

More bloggage at  http://travelingcyst.blogspot.com  and  http://www.examiner.com/retro-pop-culture-in-watertown/mark-john-astolfi

Resume at http://travelingcyst.blogspot.com/p/resume.html

Audio samples coming soon…or just check the podcasts…twc-rr so still über-blows turbo…


Posted in \baby boomers | Leave a comment

DFHC 4/15/2011

item 1 >>> Now Playing  2 Phone Calls  I know, sometimes Shelley Berman could be a little hard to take, but I’m lucky in that I always had no trouble at all. Take a few minutes and laugh along with these classic phone-call routines…Hello? Lingerie? 

item 2 >>> LQQK @ †h∆†!…  Feelings by Grassroots   From the lightweight 1968 Doris Day comedy vehicle With 6 you Get Eggroll…the Grassroots, with what might strike you as an uncharacteristically “heavy” sound for them…do I detect a touch of “Under my Thumb”?

item 3 >>> Pointless Beggingwell, if that’s what you’d call passing the hat, or sitting on the corner playing the guitar, with an upturned hat at my knee. What I’m humbly suggesting is you click on the “donate” logo, and via PayPal and your credit card, donate $10 a month…that’s 33¢ a day. Heck, some people wouldn’t stoop over to pick up 33¢ lying on the ground in the parking lot at Target’s. And to tell you the truth, I don’t honestly expect one person to do this…we’re all so ingrained with the idea that internet content is free…even I feel that way, with very rare exceptions. But taking a lesson from our feline friends, it never hurts to ask for what you want. There…as George MacMichael on The Real McCoys would announce: I’ve had my say.

item 4  >>> Old Sidekicks Never DieOr at least they didn’t on sitcoms in he 1960s. Andy Clyde (below, left) played numerous comedic saddle pals in the 30s and 40s…mostly famously as Hopalong Cassidy’s chum California Carlson. Then were was Pat Buttram as the incorrigible Eustace Haney on Green Acres, and Smiley Burnette as engineer Charlie Pratt on Petticoat Junction. And those old cats could bring it…Redd Foxx understood this, featuring lots of old black performers on Sanford and Son. (Below, right) is George MacMichael’s sister Flora…Florrie as Grampa McCoy called her…bearing a striking resemblance to Aunt Harriet on Batman. And wasn’t she also one of the boarders in the 50s classic The Day The Earth Stood Still? No, that was Aunt Bee, but you were close…

item 5  >>> And not for nothing, but…Madge Blake played an U.N.C.L.E. operative on the 1st season episode “The Yellow Scarf Affair.” Hooda thunkit?

item 6 >>> Also Sprach Johannes DæmonThis reminds me of the time on All in the Family when Edith mentioned a relative who “went west.” Archie complained: If the guy died, why don’t you just say he died? Edith replied: Oh, he didn’t die…he moved to Albuquerque…


item 5 >>> Fins to the right, Fins to the left…This may come as quite a shock to you, but not ALL 1959 Cadillacs had those humongous tail fins. When I was in college in Boston, I remember hearing what we’d call today an “urban legend”…about a downtown jogger who tripped, launched himself, and ended up with said Cadillac tail-fin sticking thru his thigh. Barely looks possible, but hoo nose?The thing is tho, in those days they had an ultra-top-of-the-line model called the Fleetwood Brougham. Cost just a skosh over $13,000…about double what a “regular” Caddy would set you back. The body for this beauty was crafted by Ghia over in Italy, and I guess they just couldn’t bring themselves to, well, you know, condone that sort of thing.

Now you might wonder if funeral cars also toned it down, but as far as I can tell…and these things are pretty well documented by the collectors of what they call “professional” vehicles…the answer is no, as seen below. And believe it or else, in that particular profession, there were fads and fancies in vehicles just like in the mainstream auto industry.The smaller photo was the revolutionary new Crown Royale Landaulet  from Superior…compared with a more traditional style, the larger picture of a Miller-Meteor Landau (no relation to the Canadian Mercury Meteor, updated today in item 7.)

item 6 >>> But If Ya Gotta Go…this might not be a bad ride…from the movie Harold and Maude, driven by Bud Cort (Harold)…and thank you, Internet Movie Cars Data Base.

item 7 >>> Speaking of Yesterday’s Cars…Yeah, thanx to my screwy filing system…both on and off the computer…I overlooked that I had some other good pix of the 1961 Mercury Meteor…the color view of the rear really shows what an odd design they came up with…shades of the Comet, nez pah?

item 8 >>> Also Yesterday’s Scat Pack…They had several different cartoon “Bee” logos, here’s another, with a tie-in to a football contest, from September 1968.

item 9 >>> Choco-LottaWe were discussing the ins and outs of Cacao, and I mentioned sampling a block of Bakers Chocolate…completely unsweetened…to get an idea of what chocolate really tastes like, sans sugar. In a word, bitter…I didn’t repeat the experiment, I can tell you. But this here, 86% is wicked high…and it was more palatable…giving a truer sense off the real flavor of chocolate. I could see getting used to liking it, like coffee or gentian root in Moxie.

item 10 >>>  Jarts Redux…And I believe I touched upon Lawn Jarts when discussing the dangers of frisbees a bit ago. Imagine my glee when I saw this in the paper…only to realize it wasn’t real Jarts, just a video game, so it’s OK. I wonder…do they have video games where you can smoke cigarettes, along with stealing cars and killing people? I’m just askin’…

Wicked Ballsy

Everybody needs a hobby…especially this person…(more ‘bras at today Stolf’s Blog, see link below…)

shameless choco-plugs, yum…

Podcasts at http://stolfpod.podbean.com  and   http://thewholething.podbean.com

Other Daily blog at http://stolf.wordpress.com  (the legendary Stolf’s Blog)

More bloggage at  http://travelingcyst.blogspot.com  and  http://www.examiner.com/retro-pop-culture-in-watertown/mark-john-astolfi

Resume at http://travelingcyst.blogspot.com/p/resume.html

Audio samples coming soon…or just check the podcasts…twc-rr so still über-blows turbo…


Posted in \baby boomers | Leave a comment

DFHC 4/14/2011

item 1 >>> Now Playing Why don’t they have a cable channel that just shows one clip like this after another, or do they already? I’m just sayin’…this was on the BBC in 1968.  Ode to Billy Joe

The Mask aka Eyes of Hell

item 3 >>> From the ODD COUPLEthe movie version that is, with Jack Lemmon and Walter Matthau. BTW, did you know before it was a movie (then a TV series of course), it was a Broadway play, with Matthau and Art Carney. They didn’t think old Norton was right for the movie, and replaced him as Felix Unger. Interestingly, during the run of the play, the leads changed several times, and Jack Klugman was once Oscar Madison, as he would be on TV. And since he was a sports writer, they had a a baseball scene in the movie, filmed with real players before the start of a game at Shea on June 27, 1967, Mets and Bucs. The original plan was to have Roberto Clemente ground into a triple play (!!!) but he literally couldn’t run slow enough, so they changed it to Bill Mazeroski. Others you’ll see include Maury Wills, Vernon Law, Ed Kranepool, Cleon Jones, Bud Harrelson, Jack Fisher, Tommy Davis, Matty Alou, Ken Boyer and umps Augie Donatelli and Al Barlick. Sorry, couldn’t find a screen capture, so the back of the rookie card will have to do…

item 4 >>> Also From YesterdayThere were some great marketing campaigns for cars back in the 60s…The Dodge Boys, the Dodge Rebellion, Pontiac’s Wide-Tracking, Ford’s Better Idea, and for a while AMC was billing it’s line as The Giant Killers. I mentioned the Scat Pack, those souped up Dodges with the Bumble-Bee stripes on the rump…but here’s cool trivia question: do you recall what the “club” Plymouth countered with was called? It was the Rapid Transit System, but it never really caught on…nice try tho…why not, sez me…

item 5 >>> Belated Thanx to an Old -30- Buddy…When I was at college, I spent a lot of time writing for the campus newspaper, in the arts sections, mostly record and concert review. I also had a rather free-wheeling column with a cheeky name. My editor was Paul Schindler, who has a blog here: PS: A Column on Things. Back in January he plugged DFHC and I thank him from the bottom of my labonza.

item 6 >>> New England-Style Clam Chowder for the Soul…Those who don’t call this a “bubbler” are so much the worse off for it, that’s all I got to say…

item 7 >>> Speaking of Cars…One of my most frequently consulted web resources is IMDB…the Internet Movie Data Base, which has an enormous amount of info on movies and TV shows. Caution: it is not infallible, and some of the entries are woefully incomplete. Still, it’s a fantastic site…one of the neatest features is you can take 2 actors and find out what shows they appeared in together. But I recently found another more offbeat site…IMCDB, the Internet Movie Cars Data Base. This identifies real vehicles that have appeared in movies and on TV, with screen captures to boot. They also have an extensive collection of unidentifieds that you can work on if you fancy yourself a car-spotting expert. I tested it with a car I remember from an episode of The Outer Limits, a slightly customized Buick Riviera meant to represent a car of the near future…and sure enough, they had it, complete with several views, and identified it as a George Barris creation. Interestingly, it was said that sometimes he claims credit for kustom jobs that he didn’t actually create. Oh really? Well, it was a long time ago, and he was über-busy, capeesh?

item 8 >>> The Ugly White North…But I was thinking about those Ford-based Mercury Meteors from yesterday. Generally when I submit a candidate for the title of the Ugliest Car Since the Invention of the Wheel, it’s a lopsided foreign model, or a customized special by someone who is borderline mentally unstable. But there have been some what-were-they-thinking regular production models, and the 1961 Mercury Meteor is a case in point. Not that it’s unforgivably terrible, just a little off. And I recalled seeing one in the 1961 Canadian movie The Mask…and IMCDB confirmed it. Below, bottom, you’ll see the front end of this car, which was based on the 1961 full-sized American Ford, and compare it to the normal American Mercury of the same year, upper left. My theory is they were utterly taken with the “split apart” headlights of the 1959 Oldsmobile, upper right, and decided to go them one better. Point is, if you happen to catch this 3D horror obscurity, and see this car that’s obviously an early 60s something…but what?…now you know.

item 9 >>> And the Back End?Also sort of messy, like it was designed by a 9th grader who got a C+ in mechanical drawing. I always liked those bulls-eye tail lights Ford had in the late 50s, early 60s…Falcon, T-bird, all thru the line. So they start with this trademark design…and extend the definition of the round lights into a sort of mutated hockey stick, then split it diagonally for good measure. As the Brits would say, what a cock-up!

item 10 >>>  Or How About (gulp) This?…It’s from George Peppard’s early 70s private eye show Banacek…it rotated on the NBC Mystery Movie, remember?…and before you choke on your succotash, there’s a logical reason why this AMX looks the way it does. It was an styling exercise in auto safety, the “crash-proof” ESV…Experimental Safety Vehicle.

But that’s not how it looked when Banacek drove it…it was redone like this, arguably not that much of an improvement…

Wicked Ballsy

Wow…talk about cool and stupid all at the same time…awesome job, guys…


ESP…experimental shameless plugs…

Podcasts at http://stolfpod.podbean.com and   http://thewholething.podbean.com

Other Daily blog at http://stolf.wordpress.com (the legendary Stolf’s Blog)

More bloggage at http://travelingcyst.blogspot.com and  http://www.examiner.com/retro-pop-culture-in-watertown/mark-john-astolfi

Resume at http://travelingcyst.blogspot.com/p/resume.html

Audio samples coming soon…or just check the podcasts…twc-rr so still über-blows turbo…


Posted in \baby boomers | Leave a comment

DFHC 4/13/2011

item 1 >>> Now Playing Rock Gently Alvino Rey and his “Talking Guitar” from 1959…this one always makes me smile…

item 2 >>> LQQK @ †h∆†!…  Don’t! One of the fake trailers from the movie GrindhouseDO!

item 3 >>> 2 Topix CollidingAnd that would be Canadian cars and the Tri-Tone craze. The subject of Canada-only versions of American cars deserves a posting all its own…actually, probably 3 or 4 to do the job right. Suffice to say, in case you weren’t aware of it, from the late 1940s thru the 1970s…and in a few limited cases several decades beyond that…familiar America models were morphed into special North-of-the-Border makes, cars with literally no counterpart stateside. Today I was simply going to touch on 2 of the dizzying array of krazy kolor kombinations that made the 1950s such a blinding automotive era, and I happened to chance upon some Canuckmobiles. Prior to WWII, only high-end luxury cars were trimmed in contrasting colors, usually the fenders or body pin-striping. For the average motorist, the fanciest you could get would be body one color, roof another, and even that wasn’t common. In the Boom after the war, the idea of a 2nd color on the body itself took hold, lead by such unique treatments as this 1952 Plymouth Belvedere (above left). And naturally, the Two-Tone look soon evolved into the Tri-Tone…

item 4 >>> Rolling Rainbows…When precisely? The general answer is the 1955 model year, in the Fall of 1954, but it wouldn’t surprise me if a few 54s or even 53s pre-dated that. And it was simple enough to do…a 2-tone body, with a 3rd color for the roof. This glorious Studebaker (above) is a 1955, and counting the green glass and chrome, would that be 5 colors? The cars below are 1956 Mercury Meteor Rideau’s, showing another tri-color scheme. And if they look suspiciously like Fords, they are. The idea was this: since many Canadian towns had just one dealership, either a Ford or a Mercury but not both, dealers were expected to sell a full price range. Thus a Ford was gussied up and called a Mercury Meteor, available at Mercury dealers as it’s entry level offering. Other models in the line besides Rideau included Niagara, Montcalm, and LeMoyne. The engine was still a Ford. Likewise, the top of the line at a Canadian Ford dealership was a Ford Monarch, which was, you guessed it, a re-trimmed Mercury. Starting in 1957 you could even get a Meteor Ranchero! And if just one person asks, I’ll post a picture. Just one.

item 5 >>> Buzz, Buzz, Buzz…But while the Tri-Tone fad proved a bit over-the-top, even for the 50s, and burned out fast, 2-Tone had a much longer shelf-life. And one of the favorites among Baby Boomers today is what’s nick-named the Bumble-Bee…yellow and black…taken to its logical marketing extreme with the Dodge Scat Pack stripes of the late 1960s. Yellow was usually the predominate color, but not always, as seen in this 1957 DeSoto Shopper wagon (great 50s name, Shopper, eh?) The 2 below it are Canadian specials, a 1955 Mercury Meteor, and at the bottom, a 1957 Pontiac Pathfinder. Look a little “wrong”? It should…it’s basically a Chevrolet body with Pontiac clips grafted onto the front and back…thus, its a good 13 inches shorter than a “real” Pontiac, and had a Chevy engine to boot, which wasn’t necessarily a bad thing I’m told…I didn’t pay much attention to the mechanicals, sue me. But again, entry level at the Pontiac dealerships.

item 6 >>> Dunno Who Started Itthe car collectors or the marble collectors, because they also call back and yellow swirl and corkscrew marbles “Bumble-Bees”…likewise, red, blue and yellow is a Superman…can you tell why? Red and blue, Spiderman…blue and yellow, Boy Scout…green and yellow, Girl Scout, etc.

item 7 >>> Speaking of Color Schemes…I’m gonna guess they didn’t actually mean to do this, but who knows, maybe they did? The latest jungle pattern for clothing sure looks to me like…Albino Zebra?

item 8 >>> Darling Brigitte…One of my favorite things to do these days is to scope out the “story behind the story” concerning things from my younger days, both major and minor, monumental and trivial. Now growing up as a conscientious Catholic lad, who took the rules quite to heart, it was always a struggle to avoid peaking at the “dirty” movie ads in the daily newspaper. As I recall, when I wrestled with my conscience, my conscience usually lost. And one of the pieces of unmitigated filth that made the biggest impression on me was this ad for the Brigitte Bardot comedy Please, Not Now! Looks pretty tame by today’s standards, nez pah?, but even now that towel gives me a wee chill. I’ve never actually seen the movie…it’s on my 2C list…but it’s said to be her typical fluff, and was notorious for an apres-bath strip-tease routine.

item 9 >>> Le Full Frontal?So how much actual nudity was involved? Mind you, the movie came out in 1961, released in the US in 1963. Again, not having seen it, I can’t say for sure.  The still photo below appears to be what the advertising is based on, and you can see where they covered her up with some extra locks of hair…but apparently even that wasn’t enough…

item 10 >>>  The Brit Take…Because the “advert” as it appeared in the UK had a subtle difference…notice in the red US version, the’ve added a strap along her arm-pit, suggesting she’s wearing something…a bra, a bikini top, whatever. In the blue British version, this fussy bit of censorship is absent, and in its place, a shadow or tan-line. Those were the days, were’t they? Interestingly enough, as I was researching this film (original French title La Bride Sur le Cou, meaning given free reign or a free hand…alternate English title Only For Love), it didn’t crop up on the Legion of Decency’s list of Condemned movies, meaning it probably got a B rating…morally objectionable in part for all. Actually, Uncle Wiki’s list of infamous C films seems a little off, especially since of all things The Odd Couple is on it, the movie version with Lemmon and Matthau. Now it’s been a while since I’ve seen that, but I’m trying to think what could have been the problem? Some sort of hint at an alternative lifestyle in the word “couple” maybe? You think? Nawwww…BTW, interesting baseball bit from that movie on tomorrow’s posting…same time, same computer…

Wicked Ballsy

Seems to me I read somewhere that that towel is now on display at the Smithsonian…well, if not, it ought be…I mean, if they have Archie Bunker’s chair and the Fonz’s jacket…sheesh…

le shameless apres-plugs, n’est-que pas?

Podcasts at http://stolfpod.podbean.com and   http://thewholething.podbean.com

Other Daily blog at http://stolf.wordpress.com (the legendary Stolf’s Blog)

More bloggage at http://travelingcyst.blogspot.com and  http://www.examiner.com/retro-pop-culture-in-watertown/mark-john-astolfi

Resume at http://travelingcyst.blogspot.com/p/resume.html

Audio samples coming soon…or just check the podcasts…twc-rr so still über-blows turbo…


Posted in \baby boomers | Leave a comment

DFHC 4/12/2011

item 1 >>> Now Playing…   White on White Up until today, didn’t know Danny Williams was…whoops, not supposed to say that in this post-racial world, sorry…

item 2 >>> LQQK @ †h∆†! White Room As often happens, the live performance isn’t up to the recorded version, but nice to see them anyway.

LOL-binos!

item ∞ >>>  This is sort of Deep-Fried Hoodsie Cups “Offical White Paper.” My LOL-Equines from a while back were very well received, but I wanted to try something that hasn’t been done before on the net…or at least not very much…so here we go…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wicked Ballsy

To quote Zero Mostel as Max Bialystock in Mel Brooks’ The Producers…Flaunt it, baby, flaunt it!


 

Podcasts at http://stolfpod.podbean.com and   http://thewholething.podbean.com

Other Daily blog at http://stolf.wordpress.com (the legendary Stolf’s Blog)

More bloggage at http://travelingcyst.blogspot.com and  http://www.examiner.com/retro-pop-culture-in-watertown/mark-john-astolfi

Resume at http://travelingcyst.blogspot.com/p/resume.html

Audio samples coming soon…or just check the podcasts…twc-rr so still über-blows turbo…


Posted in \baby boomers | Leave a comment

DFHC 4/11/2011

item 1 >>> Now PlayingDanny Kaye’s D-O-D-G-E-R-S If you’ve never heard this, what a treat! It was recorded in 1962, altho the experts say it doesn’t recount an actual game.

item 2 >>> LQQK @ †h∆†! Pure Filthy Catch A few years ago, there was a video of a ball-girl “climbing the wall” to make an spectacular “Spiderman” catch…but it was completely fake. This appears to be completely real. And if you ever wondered how they would do without gloves, check this out…  Is That Cricket?


item 3 >>>  Wait a minute…you don’t write for the Boston Globe…
Yeah, they wish. No, I just like this old-timey newspaper logo, and since they’re not using it any more, what’s the harm. But listen, you got a question to ask or what?

item 4 >>> Fine…So why are they the Toronto Maple Leafs, not Leaves?…I aways liked Mark Twain when he said: “I was gratified to be able to answer so quickly…I said I didn’t know.” Perhaps the ultimate explanation is hiding out somewhere on the net, but here’s what I can come up with: The hockey team started using the nickname in the 1920s, altho the minor league Toronto baseball team had been the Leafs since the 1890s. Hockey historians say the NHL team was named after something called the “Maple Leaf Regiment,” which gained worldwide fame in WWI. Perhaps this refers to the “Prince of Wales Royal Canadian Regiment of Foot 100th,” formed in 1858, and which used a Maple Leaf as its badge. This suggests the nickname refers to a proper name, which can sometimes supersede the rules for forming irregular plurals. For example, you wouldn’t refer to the extended clan of Mr. and Mrs. Leaf as the Leaves, but the Leafs, right?

item 5 >>> Oh, you mean like being a Red Sock?…Don’t get me started. You can be a Yankee, an Angel, a Twin, in the minors a Mud Dog, or whatever…but a Red Sock or a Red Sox? Google returns 12 thousand hits for the singular, 17 million for the more common plural. But back to the Maple Leafs, when the irregular plural does not refer to the common thing but to something else, following the right rule can sound odd. Like if the neighborhood miscreant “gooses” you twice in one day, you wouldn’t be the recipient of 2 geese, but 2 gooses. This lexicological battle is being played out today with the computer mouse. I call more than one “mouses”…in this context “mice” just sounds wrong, but people do say it that way.

item 6 >>> So what’s with Manny?…OK, you are getting me started. Let me state for the record I’ve always liked him, especially as a Red Sock, and that ain’t gonna change any time soon. I was watching the Boston-New York game on Fox Saturday, and they talked about everything under the sun except what was happening on the field, including Manny, and the bigger question of the Hall of Fame. The consensus was that they hated having to vote, since they felt compelled to blackball Steroid Era players, both admitted and accused. They also hoped that might change sometime in the future, but you know it hasn’t changed for Shoeless Joe Jackson (found innocent in a court of law BTW) nor is it changing for Pete Rose. My point is, I don’t care about drugs, nor do I think the vast majority of fans do either. Then again, I don’t care very much about the Hall of Fame…I’ve never gone, never intend to. That Ron Santo could die while still outside looking in is more than enough to prove its complete irrelevancy to the true baseball fan. My favorite players are my favorites, and a plaque on a wall means nothing to me. And yes, I’m pretty much going with Manny’s explanation from the last time this happened: something is causing those test results, but not anything illegal cuz he didn’t take anything. End of story, and I’m sticking to it. Same with Rocket Roger.

item 7 >>> Are you braced for another season of koo-koo baseball “records”?…Well yes, but sometimes they can be fun. For example, say team-mates Babe and Duke each hit a home run in their team’s season opener. They do it again in the 2nd game, then in the 3rd as well. Ever happened? Not till Ian Kinsler and Nelson Cruz for the Rangers in 2011. Now that’s not earth-shattering as records go, but it’s kinda cool
nonetheless. And Cruz ended up homering in the first 4 games, only done previously by Willie Mays and Mark McGuire. I can live with that. And while I’m thinking about it, I was dismayed to see where the Pale Hose have designated Lastings Milledge for reassignment, One of the all-time great baseball names, right up there with Shooty Babitt, Purnal Goldy, and Marvell Wynne. (BTW…one of life’s little disappointments…looking up Purnal Goldy’s middle name…William…geez, that’s it?…)

item 8 >>> Thinking back to the “one big list” NFL format you outlined around Super Bowl time, you must be loving this time of year…Oh baby, you are so right. One of the most useful catch-phrases to come out of a movie in my lifetime is Will Smith in Men in Black…”Now that’s what I’m taking about!” Take a look…glorious isn’t it. My proposals were on my other blog, Stolf’s Blog…see link below. And crazy as it sounds, I even included a way to make NFL post-season playoffs best 2 of 3 instead of single elimination. Truth is, once I got to figuring it, it turns out to be a lot more feasible than you might think.

item 9 >>> I noticed Bronson Arroyo on Saturday gave up only one earned run…but that was on his own throwing error. What’s up with that?…It’s true that there are some odd score-keeping quirks in pro sports, regarding who gets credit for what. One of my favorites is in football. Say a runner scampers 30 yards, then at the end of the play fumbles, and the opposing team recovers. Is he credited with 30 yards rushing? Of course. So if a Quarterback throws a 30 yard interception with no return, isn’t that the same thing? But he doesn’t get those 30 yards. Now the whole concept of
earned versus unearned runs is tricky…we’re trying to account for runs caused by the pitcher’s pitching, as opposed to other things happening on the field, included mental errors, for which there is no statistical accounting. Some have even argued that Runs Batted In is a phony stat, because it’s situational to the point of being meaningless. But for what ERA is supposed to do, yes, the pitcher as a fielder is separate from the pitcher as a pitcher, leave it at that. And not for nothing, but one of the few insights of Sabermetics that I do find worthwhile is the idea of “range factor”…that is, perhaps a fielder commits more errors because he can physically get to more balls than his less talented counterparts.

item 10 >>>  Speaking of Sabermetics, I know you’re a big proponent of “real” baseball math, so would you care to comment on this?… Indeed I would. Since the Mets first season was 1962, this is absolutely correct. Simply go back…1962 was their 1st season, 1963 their 2nd, 1964 their 3rd, etc. Notice the season is always one less than the year. One less from 2011 gives you 50, not 51…as Archie Bunker would say, ipso fatso. Once the relationship between the number of the season and the year is set at the beginning, it never changes. Glad to see someone can still count. Now take this here (below)…

If they mean “our 31st year!” in the sense that 1980 was their 1st year, then they’re wrong…2011 is their 32nd…here the number is always one more than the year, since the 1 in 1st is one more than the 0 in 1980. On the other hand, if they mean their 1st year was something like June 1, 1980 thru May 31, 1981…then they are indeed in their 31st year, and will be until May 31, 2011. Their 32nd year will start June 1, 2011. But hoo nose? And that’s the trouble …you have no idea what they mean, so why even bother? It’s the nadir of shabby journalism when no one can possibly know for sure what they’re talking about, sez me.

Wicked Ballsy

One of my favorite baseball pictures….the 1939 Oakland Oaks of the Pacific Coast League…ready…aim…shoot the other guys!


shameless plugs to be named later…

Podcasts at http://stolfpod.podbean.com and   http://thewholething.podbean.com

Other Daily blog at http://stolf.wordpress.com (the legendary Stolf’s Blog)

More bloggage at http://travelingcyst.blogspot.com and  http://www.examiner.com/retro-pop-culture-in-watertown/mark-john-astolfi

Resume at http://travelingcyst.blogspot.com/p/resume.html

Audio samples coming soon…or just check the podcasts…twc-rr so still über-blows turbo…


Posted in \baby boomers | Leave a comment

G4BB part 14: Kinship in Action!

 

Kinship in Action!

 

14.1 Duane Alwin is a professor of Sociology at Penn State…so he should know better. But he doesn’t, and likes to say that he is is own cousin. In his words: “I get a kick out of telling people that I am a cousin to myself. When I use my genealogy software to print out the descendants of [an ancestor], I appear twice, and in different generations…once as a descendent of my grandfather and once in my grandmother’s line. What better proof that I am my own cousin.”

14.2 Now a bit of clarification…obviously, everyone is descended directly from their Grandfather and Grandmother…big deal. What he’s saying is, on his Family Tree, he exists in 2 different places, in 2 separate lines of descent. Of course this can’t happen without some degree of in-breeding…and remember, 2nd cousin marriages are almost universally accepted, and 1st cousin marriages, today and thru-out history, are extremely common, and not unheard of even in Western Society. So is that what’s behind this? Sort of…

14.3 What happened in Duane’s family was this: his Mother’s parents were 1st Cousins One Removed…that is, his Grandfather married his 1st Cousin’s Daughter. This is difficult to show on a standard Family Tree diagram, thus we turn to the “Tinker-toys”…what I call a Parental Tree, since who marries who, or who procreates with who, is not indicated…simply whom each individual’s parents are. Duane’s case, omitting parents not relevant to the issue at hand, is shown in Chart 41a.

14.4 As you can see, W and X are Brothers, and their Sons Y and Z are 1st Cousins. Z and Y’s daughter “Gram” are the parents of “Mom.” As Duane explains, “Because they are both daughters of first cousins, my mother is a second cousin to her own mother.” This is tricky to see in Chart 41a, so in Chart 41b I’ve moved Mom up even with Gram…now you can see that since Mom’s Father Z and Gram’s Father Y are indeed 1st Cousins, Mom and Gram are 2nd Cousins.

14.5 But where does that leave Duane? Check Chart 41c. Here I have duplicated Mom and D (for Duane), placing her directly beneath her Mother, the duplicates both highlighted by light green. And by all rights, that duplicate Mom should be connected to her Father Z with a long black line, but I’ve left it out for simplicity’s sake. But now we can see the truth of what Duane says: “This makes me a third cousins to my mother, as she and I are both children of second cousins.” What makes it confusing is that one of those “second cousins” he mentions is Mom herself, but it is what it is…this is what’s meant by being in 2 places at once in the Family Tree. “To myself I am a third cousin once removed.” And if you compare the position of the 2 D’s, he’s right, as far as that goes.

14.6 I know of no culture or kinship system…and I’ll bet Duane doesn’t either…where you can correctly call yourself your own relative, no matter what the Family Tree says. Heck, by this reasoning, isn’t everyone a sibling to themselves, by virtue of having the “same parents”? Still, this provides an excellent exercise in sorting out such relationships, and it may call to mind a little song, which you might want to pause and listen to here:  I’m My Own Grandpa

14.7 In the 1930s, Dwight Latham and Moe Jaffe had a group called the Jesters, who specialized in novelty songs and recitations. They got the idea from reading this anecdote by Mark Twain:

14.8 But the concept of being your own Grandparent goes back much further…it was one of the puzzles (“What would the 2 sons be to each other?”) in the Baital Pachisi collection of stories, written in India in the 11th century. Twain, who was born in 1835, may have gotten the idea from a bit of filler that was popular in newspapers, the earliest example  being from 1822…

14.9 The resulting song was first recorded by the comedy duo of Lonzo and Oscar in 1947…then by Guy Lombardo and his orchestra in 1948…and many times since, including Homer and Jethro, Ray Stevens, Grandpa Jones, Phil Harris’ “He’s His Own Grandpa,” and Jo Stafford’s “I’m My Own Grandmaw.” Lyrics vary slightly from version to version, but here’s the basic setup…

14.10 Lines 2, 3 and 4 of the first stanza pretty much say it all…your Father marries your Wife’s Daughter…and the rest is just a review of some of the resulting oddball relationships, leading up to the titular punch-line. I leave it to you as an exercise to check if the claims the narrator makes are correct, but at this stage of the game I have no reason to think they aren’t. Charts 42a and 42b diagram the basic situation in both traditional Family Tree and Parental Tree formats. On Chart 42a I have labeled all the relevant individuals, the song’s narrator being “ME”…the 2 shaded individuals are parents not mentioned in the song…and on 42b you can pretty much see who corresponds with who.

14.11 To clarify exactly what’s going on, I’ve again used the duplication method…in this case, taking the narrator’s Father, along with the rest of the Tree…and placing it right next to his wife…the duplicates shaded in yellow…Chart 43.


 

14.12 Thus in Chart 44, we see that ME is part of both his generation, and also part of his Grandparent’s generation, as indicated by the green boxes. But the question remains…Is he really his own Grandpa?


 

14.13 While I hate to be a spoilsport, the answer I come up with is No. At best, he is his Step-Grandmother’s 2nd Husband, and that’s about it. From Charts 43 and 44, his Father’s new Wife is obviously his Step-Mother…but would his Step-Mother’s Mother be his Step-Grandmother? How did they work it on The Brady Bunch? And even if that were the case, the shaded blue individual, not the narrator himself, is the narrator’s real Step-Grandfather, being his Step-Mother’s actual Father. Still, cool tune, no denying that. (BTW, thanks for not suggesting time-travel and all the sci-fi implications of that….have mercy!)

14.14 And depending on what you read, such a thing may have happened not so long ago. Bill Wyman, bass-player of the Rolling Stones, married Mandy Smith on June 2, 1989…she was 18, he was 52. The marriage ended early in 1991, altho by some accounts the divorce wasn’t finalized until 1993, by which time his son Stephen had become engaged to her mother Patsy, aged 30 and 46 respectively. When precisely the 2nd couple married is the tricky part…and not for nothing, but while the song tells of one big happy, if somewhat confused, family, the word is that Bill wasn’t happy about it at all, and neither Stephen nor Patsy were invited to his next wedding.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

 

14.15  Dear Stolf: Back when you were discussing “Grand Uncle” versus “Great Uncle” in 8.4, you mentioned seeing a chart where both those terms were used, referring to different relatives! Well, check where I’m from, and do what needs to be done…from Annabelle in Hannibal, MO…P.S. Pretty tricky the way you number paragraphs for future reference.

 

 

14.16 Yeah, tricky can be good. And hey, thanks for calling my bluff. You know, it reminds me of a Ford commercial Lee Iococca did many moons ago, where he said “I’m from Missouri…prove it!” Of course now that I think about it, maybe that famous phrase is copyrighted or something, so I won’t even say it, just do what I’m told.

14.17 Consulting my files, I found the chart in question was printed out 5 years ago, so there was the distinct possibility they’d fixed the boo-boo…or perhaps the site didn’t even exist any more. But luck was with us this day, and it’s still there, still as incomprehensible as ever…and this is just a portion of it…

14.18 What this chart does is perhaps not immediately obvious. You’re dealing with 3 individuals, the one in the top row, the one in the far left column, and their Common Ancestor. Depending on how they are related to that CA, where the row and column intersects is their relationship to each other. To take a simple example, the Grandson (row) of the CA is to the Son (column) of the CA…a nephew. Now I have marked the problem areas in red.

 

14.19 As you can see, they start off on the right foot, with Grand Nephew instead of Great Nephew. But then the next one down inexplicably is Great Nephew…and all the ones circled in red are incorrect. Now I know the feeling…you’ve just put together a brutally complex chart, and you don’t for the energy to double-check it…but YOU HAVE TO!

14.20 And in all fairness, it’s possible composer Peggy J. Rogers and/or contributor Charles A. Oliver don’t really think that Great Nephew/Uncle and Grand Nephew/Uncle are 2 different things. The simple oversight could be with “Great Nephew”…it should read “Great Grand Nephew,” and there should be a “Grand” before “Nephew” all the way down the column. That they make the same oversight in the corresponding row does not bode well for my theory that it only was just an oversight, but I’m feeling charitable today, so there ya go. Next week, more Kinship in Action, and letters too…

Wicked Ballsy

 

Copyright © 2011 Mark John Astolfi, All Rights Reserved

shameless plugs that shamelessly plug themselves…

Podcasts at http://stolfpod.podbean.com and   http://thewholething.podbean.com

Other Daily blog at http://stolf.wordpress.com (Stolf’s Blog)

More bloggage at http://travelingcyst.blogspot.com and  http://www.examiner.com/retro-pop-culture-in-watertown/mark-john-astolfi

Resume at http://travelingcyst.blogspot.com

Audio samples coming soon…or just check the podcasts…


Posted in \baby boomers | Leave a comment

DFHC 4/9/2011

item 1 >>> Now Playing When I’m Cleaning Windows George Formby was a comedic singer in the UK from the 1920s thru the 1950s…he’s generally thought of as a ukelele player, altho it sometimes appears he is holding a banjo. That’s because he played a banjolele, a 4-stringed banjo played similarly to a uke. He is also mentioned in the item 2 video.

item 2 >>> LQQK @ †h∆†!…  “Fighting Trousers” by Prof. Elemental This is the latest musical craze in England, called “chap rap.” You can just watch the first minute or so to get the general flavor of it. Balmy, sez me, but that’s fads for you…

item 3 >>>  Ex-Pir-i-Ment…I don’t hear it that much any more, but back in the day, one of the silliest buzz-words, IMHO, was “experiment.” As in experimental theater, experimental writing, an “experiment in television,” etc. And close on its heels was “lab”…anything and everything that purported to have some special significance could be called a lab…like a “language lab.” What happened to your eyebrows? Oh, I mixed French with German and it blew up. “Bar” took on a similar meaning a little while later…I remember a department store that had something labeled a “socks bar.” (???)  Anyway so you might hear a Baby Boomer remark that when they were in college, they “experimented” with sex. I feel like asking, who was your lab partner? See, to me, a true experiment is walking on a frozen puddle 3 weeks into March…

item 4 >>> Memories are Funny… Back on 3/31 I mentioned that growing up we had one of those creepy elf cookie-jars with the leafy hat…the pix I found had hats of pink and red, but I remember green. Sibs contend it was black, in keeping with the original 1956 color scheme of the kitchen, black and turquoise. (Well, turquoise they called it back then, along with aqua, altho I always used the pedestrian “blue-green.”) But then another sib remembers there was pink involved too, altho I wonder if that was the first of several renovations. But I do remember black cabinets…plus the exterior of our ranch house was painted black.

item 5 >>> Here we go…0 for April…Red Sox are 0-6 on the road, worst start I think they said since 1776. I read where they’ll be returning to a very hostile Fenway Park crowd. ¡Ay caramba, it’s only a game, folks!  And since I wrote the preceding, they got their first win, over the Yanks no less…funny game, no? And at least in times like these, the Red Sox Nation has its memories to fall back on, like 2004 for example: down 0-3 to the Yankees, then 8 straight wins and the Curse is no more. Arguably even more exciting was the Impossible Dream of 1967.


item 6 >>> Setting the Stage…
August and September of ’67 was a 4-way see-saw battle for the top spot between the Red Sox, Tigers, Twins, and White Sox…and remember, the previous season Boston had finished 9th of 10 teams, so they were definitely the Cinderella at this dance. And it continued with no letup into the final week, with the Pale Hose eliminated by 5 straight losses, culminating in a doubleheader loss to the A’s on September 27…and how we hated their manager Eddie Stanky! Going into the final weekend, the Twins were up by a game over both Boston and Detroit. Boston and Minnesota met for 2 at Fenway, while the Tigers had 2 games in hand…rainouts resulted in double-headers both Saturday and Sunday with the Angels. Sox won Saturday, Tigers split, leaving Boston and Minnesota tied for first, and Detroit just a half game back on that final Sunday, October 1st. So I was glued to the TV right? Wrong…our family went to see The Sound of Music…a matinee, I’m guessing in Saugus…altho I probably had my transistor with me, to catch the updates when the movie let out.

item 7 >>> Fandimonium…It was Ace versus Ace, Jim Lonborg and Dean Chance…Twins took a 2-0 lead into the bottom of the 6th. Lonborg bunted his way on, then singles by key mid-season pickup Jerry Adair and Dalton Jones loaded them up. Up next is Yaz…now everybody remembers he won the last Triple Crown that year (well, tied for home runs with Killebrew) but he also lead the league in Slugging %, On Base Average, runs, hits, was 3rd in doubles, 4th in walks…and was named MVP to boot. But what you might not remember was in the final 12 games, he went 23 for 44, batting .523, hitting in 11 of those 12 games, drove in 16, scored 14, and had 5 homers….and that included going 7 for 8 in those last 2 games with the Twins. Well sure enough, a solid single to center, the game is tied…3 wild pitches and a fielders choice make it 5-2 and that’s how it ended. But the Tigers won their 1st game with the Angels…and New England held its collective breath as we followed the 2nd game. Dick McAuliffe grounded into a double play to seal the Angels victory in the nightcap, and I had to break out the colored pencils for the above “headline” in my diary.

item 8 >>> But What a Season…In April, rookie Bill Rohr comes within one out of a no-hitter against the Yankees…the spoiler, Elston Howard, is traded to the Sox in August for Pete Magrini and Ron Klimkowski, and provides a steadying influence on the pitchers. Ken “The Hawk” Harrelson comes over from the A’s…Reggie Smith and Mike Andrews have great rookie years…not for nothing, but George “Boomer” Scott hit .303, 4th best in the AL…and of course, the tragic beaning of Tony Conigliaro. The Series loss to the Cardinals was anticlimactic..but what a ride! And y’know, I think the whole country was baseball crazy that year…even Peanuts introduced a short-lived character, the legendary José Peterson…

item 9 >>>  Puppies Rock!…Couple of cartoons from Friday’s funny pages…

item 10 >>>  Speaking of Frisbees…Poor Stewart…I believe frisbees actually killed more people back in the day than lawn jarts, but what gets banned…go figure…

Wicked Ballsy

Here’s a close-up view of what the Beatles…and everybody else for that matter…looked like…analog…in the groove…

shameless plug/base average of 1.000…

Podcasts at http://stolfpod.podbean.com and   http://thewholething.podbean.com

Other Daily blog at http://stolf.wordpress.com (the legendary Stolf’s Blog)

More bloggage at http://travelingcyst.blogspot.com and  http://www.examiner.com/retro-pop-culture-in-watertown/mark-john-astolfi

Resume at http://travelingcyst.blogspot.com/p/resume.html

Audio samples coming soon…or just check the podcasts…twc-rr so still über-blows turbo…


Posted in \baby boomers | Leave a comment